- Journal List
- Dermatol Pract Concept
- v.12(1); 2022 Feb
- PMC8824545
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2022 Feb; 12(1): e2022018.
Published online 2022 Jan 1. doi:10.5826/dpc.1201a18
PMCID: PMC8824545
PMID: 35223163
1Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer
Abstract
Introduction
Slowing the aging process by use of collagen supplements has become a driving force in the field of dermatology and cosmetics. Generally, oral and topical collagen are used in anti-aging products, as reported in the literature.
Objectives
The overarching goal of this research is to collate the consequences of oral collagen with those of topical collagen in reducing or delaying the aging process.
Methods
We executed an electronic search in Google Scholar and PubMed. We considered a study eligible if it was original research, published in English between 2010 and 2020, and if it provided information on the topic of collagen and aging. We retrieved 12 full-text articles, and these were assessed by reviewers independently.
Results
All human studies included in the review were randomized controlled trials mainly conducted in high- to middle-income countries which highlighted that both oral and topical collagen supplements help to delay the aging process, with no differences arising between the two types of collagen. The evidence from the reviewed studies suggested that both collagen supplements improve skin moisture, elasticity, and hydration when orally administered. Additionally, collagen reduces the wrinkling and roughness of the skin, and existing studies have not found any side effects of its oral supplements.
Conclusions
Both oral and topical collagen can contribute to reducing or delaying skin aging. Future epidemiological studies with large sample sizes and thorough follow-up measures would be required to comprehensively understand the potential effects of these two types of collagen on the aging process.
Keywords: aging, oral collagen, topical collagen, collagen supplements, wrinkling
Introduction
Aging of the skin is a continuous process related to a depletion in the physiological function of the skin [1]. Both natural and unnatural factors cause human beings and animals to experience physiological alterations in different organs as time passes [2]. Cutaneous aging is a multifactorial activity dependent on both inherent (genetic, hormonal, and metabolic), and extrinsic factors (perennial exposure to UV rays, smoking, air pollution, chemicals and poor nutrition) [3,4]. Aging has a detrimental effect on connective tissue in the skin, leading to declines in elastin and collagen fibers and thus resulting in fine lines and wrinkles [3]. Furthermore, aging reduces the production of proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycan (such as hyaluronic acid) in the skin, as well as cartilage [4]. As a result, skin tissue weakens, losing its integrity, and the skin becomes dry, unable to retain enough moisture. Although multiple intrinsic processes can affect the aging process, factors such as exposure to sun, liquid intake, lifestyle, and pollution can exacerbate the aging process [1]. Moreover, skin wrinkling also progresses as dermal thickness is reduced over time due to decreased collagen [5,6].
Most of the collagen supplements recommended by experts are enriched with peptides containing amino acids - including proline, glycine, and hydroxyproline - considered to be essential components of collagen [7–9]. Beyond this, researchers have claimed that increasing peptide production of hyaluronic acid in skin fibroblasts induces fibroblast migration and strengthens collagen, thus raising the amount of moisture in the stratum corneum [10]. Hence, the existing data suggest that the presence of these proteins in the body helps to maintain the amount of collagen in the skin [10]. Furthermore, collagen is considered crucial for skin health because both photo-aging and intrinsic aging decrease its presence in the body [11]. This in turn causes a decrease in the skin thickness, as well as a loss of elasticity and flexibility [12].
In recent years, collagen supplements have been increasingly used, as they are advertised as a potential remedy against the aging process [13]. It has been found that marine fish collagen has hom*ology with human collagen and therefore it has been widely utilized as nutritional addendum along with collagen peptides [14]: they have a very good safety profile, biocompatibility, high bioavailability in the human gastrointestinal barrier, safety, and high bioactivity [15].
Objectives
Current research reveals that collagen use could result in a reduction of wrinkles, rejuvenation of skin, and reversal of skin aging [16], which may improve skin hydration and elasticity [17]. However, the available evidence regarding types of collagen or its mechanism of action, duration to produce desired results and side effects have not been rigorously reviewed or synthesized. This could create controversy in using collagen to reverse the aging process. Moreover, it is yet unclear which type of collagen (topical or oral) needs to be used to produce these coveted effects. Therefore, we undertook this research to collate the consequences of oral collagen with those of topical collagen in reducing or delaying the aging process.
Methods
The researcher conducted this research to appraise, synthesize, and aggregate the available evidence to measure how both oral and topical collagen are used to reduce or delay the aging process.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The researcher carried out an electronic search on different attributes of collagen, such as the benefits of collagen supplements, types, mechanisms of action, and side effects, as well as how long it takes to produce results. Study inclusion eligibility was contingent on whether the research had focused the effects of collagen supplements on aging reversal and whether it was an original study published in English from 2010 to 2020 across both developed and developing countries. The researcher excluded secondary data, letters to the editor, case reports, and gray literature from this review.
Information Sources and Search Strategy
The research was conducted by the researcher who completed a search of published articles in 2020, scanning databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar. An independent search was carried out by the author, who examined the results for potentially appropriate studies, retrieving any needed full-text articles. The researcher grouped search terms into 4 major categories by PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria. The researcher identified a combination of Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) keywords and text words. The most prevalent search terms found in abstracts and titles included the following: “collagen supplement and aging,” “collagen supplement and wrinkles,” “role of collagen supplement in skin rejuvenation, “collagen supplement and aging reversal,” “benefits of collagen supplements in reducing aging,” “types of collagen in reducing aging,” “mechanism of collagen supplements in reducing aging” and “side effects of collagen supplements used for anti-aging”.
Data Extraction
All appropriate research studies were imported into the reference manager software (Endnote, Clarivate Analytics) file, where each study was reviewed, and titles were also screened for duplicates. The abstracts were not considered for further review, which did not explicitly explore the study objective. Finally, the full-text articles of the remaining germane articles were obtained and examined. This action was followed by abstracting and summarizing the articles that met the eligibility criteria using a proforma standard. Aside from this, the bibliography of the remaining studies was scrutinized to avoid missing any useful studies. This process of searching the articles was carried out independently by the author, and their judgments and extracted summaries were matched to identify the differences and to resolve them accordingly.
Independent reviewers filled out a standardized data extraction sheet for the eligible research articles. The reviewers compared the data extraction tables to ensure including the imperative findings of the eligible studies and pilot tested these sheets before beginning the extraction process. Besides, prevailing research articles on the chosen topic were reviewed to describe the data extraction proforma objectives. Any discrepancies between the independent reviewers were resolved by consensus between two other reviewers.
Results
Decisions Reached Regarding the Search Strategy
The researcher screened the identified articles initially by titles, then by abstracts, and finally, a full-text article assessment was carried out, discarding any articles not meeting the pre-defined eligibility criteria. As a result, the initial search identified 820 citations in PubMed and Google Scholar; however, 150 articles were duplicates. Of the remaining 670 unique studies, the researcher reviewed titles and abstracts, finding 150 relevant abstracts. Upon reviewing the latters, 135 articles did not meet the eligibility criteria. Hence, the researcher was able to retrieve the complete texts of 15 articles, though more than 12 articles met the necessary criteria and were included in the review, as shown in Figure 1.
Usage of Oral Collagen Supplements: Evidence from Human Studies
A study was conducted in Japan in which authors gave collagen peptides to patients with aging, wrinkled skin (Table 1). These patients included 66 women from Japan who were more than 40 years old, about whom researchers recorded any improvements in skin parameters. These patients were given either 10 g of collagen for 56 continuous days or no treatment at all (placebo) [18]. The authors observed a statistically noteworthy dissimilarity in the moisture of the skin throughout the experiment, accompanied by a substantial increase in the moisture for the group under treatment when compared with the placebo group. Skin moisture analyzers were utilized to test skin moisture; they are portable devices that test different skin factors utilizing bioelectric impedance analysis. The level of skin moisture is ascertained by the time it takes for the current to travel across the skin. Additionally, the same study enrolled French women of more than 40 years old and followed a similar protocol for collagen treatment for about 3 continuous months. At the completion of treatment, the author found a noteworthy moisture elevation in the collagen treatment group compared with the placebo group [18].
Table 1
Previous usage of Oral Collagen Supplements: Evidence from Human Studies
| Study Author | Study Year | Country | Study Design | Sample Size | Participants | Age (Years) | Intervention | Control Arm | Study Results | Adverse Effects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sangsuwan et al [40] | 2020 | Thailand | RCT | 36 | Postmenopausal women | 50–60 | 5 grams of oral collagen hydrolysate | Placebo |
| None |
| Žmitek et al [39] | 2020 | Germany | RCT | 34 | Caucasian Healthy females | 40–65 | 10 mL of a syrup having fish collagen and other active ingredients | 10 mL of colored placebo having flavors without active ingredients |
| None |
| Campos et al [29] | 2019 | RCT | 60 | Healthy study participants | 40–50 | Topical and hydrolyzed collagen | Placebo in oral form |
| None | |
| Bolke et al [41] | 2019 | Germany | RCT | 72 | Healthy females | ≥35 | 2.5 grams of collagen and other active ingredients | Placebo |
| None |
| Kim et al [21] | 2018 | Korea | RCT | 64 | Korean women | 40–60 | Collagen with low molecular weight | Placebo |
| None |
| Inoue et al [22] | 2017 | China | RCT | 85 | Chinese women | 35–55 | Collagen hydrolysate having a higher content of bioactive collagen- Collagen hydrolysate having a lower content of bioactive collagen | Placebo |
| None |
| Genovese et al [19] | 2017 | Rome (Italy) | RCT | 120 F:111 M: 9 | Volunteer subjects | 47.72 (6.5) 49.65 (6.5) | 50 mL of collagen | Placebo |
| No adverse events |
| Sanz et al [27] | 2015 | Spain | Open and intraindividual study clinical Study | 32 women | Women with sensitive skin bearing wrinkles | 45–55 (median: 49) | Serum containing an amalgamation of pro-collagen lipopeptide, extract of apple, creatine, and urea | Self-control |
| Not reported |
| Asserin et al [42] | 2015 | Japan and France | RCT | 66 Japanese and 106 French women | Japanese and French women | 40–59 40–65 | 10 g of collagen | Placebo |
| None |
| Proksch et al [20] | 2013 | Not reported | RCT | 69 | women | 35–55 years old | 2.5 g of CH, and 5.0 g of CH | 2.5 g of placebo, and 5.0 g of placebo |
| None |
| Byrne et al [30] | 2010 | Ireland | RCT | 22 | Caucasian female subjects | 39 to 60 | Triple peptide complex (3%) | Placebo |
| None |
| Aust et al [28] | 2008 | Germany | Retrospective analysis | 480 F: 400 M: 80 | Patients | The mean (SD) was 49 ± 15.5 years | Percutaneous collagen | Self-control |
| Not reported |
CH = collagen hydrolysate; SD = standard deviation; RCT = randomized control trial.
Moving forward, researchers undertook a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in order to evaluate the potency of collagen peptides [19]. Recruited participants were randomly assigned to ingest either oral liquid supplements containing collagen peptides (50 ml) or placebo daily for 12 weeks [19]. No noteworthy dissimilarity in skin elasticity was noticed between the 2 arms (Table 1). However, in the subgroup analysis, the authors noticed that study participants who underwent cosmetic surgeries in the treatment group showed improvement in skin elasticity, as opposed to their counterparts, who showed no improvement. At the completion of the study, participants in the therapeutic arm achieved higher marks in some skin parameters like hydration and elasticity [19].
In another RCT, women were allocated to 4 different arms [20]. The first arm received 2.5 grams of collagen hydrolysate, the second arm was given 5.0 grams of collagen hydrolysate, the third arm received 2.5 grams of a placebo, and the fourth arm was given 5.0 grams of placebo [20]. Participants were followed for around 60 days, and it was found that each treatment arm with a different dose of collagen hydrolysate showed a statistically noteworthy rise in the elasticity of the skin when juxtaposed with their counterparts in 2 placebo groups. Improvement in elasticity was noticed among elderly women relatively earlier (ie, at 1-month follow-up) [20]. Furthermore, a positive correlation was observed between treatment with collagen hydrolysate and skin moisture and evaporation, with statistically insignificant results [20].
Another double-blinded RCT was undertaken to assess the collagen (with low molecular weight) effects on the elasticity of the skin elasticity, hydration, and finally wrinkling [21]. This study was conducted with Korean women at least 40 years old (n = 64) who were randomized to 1000 mg of collagen or to placebo every day for 3 months [21]. The authors found noteworthy elevations in skin hydration in the treatment arm even at 6 weeks of follow-up when compared to the placebo group. Furthermore, different parameters of skin wrinkling (all 3 parameters) and skin elasticity (1/3 parameters) were notably elevated in the treatment arm when compared with the placebo group, as shown in Table 1 [21].
In the same vein, 1 more RCT was conducted to find out the effects of collagen hydrolysate constituted of the bioactive dipeptides, prolylhydroxyproline, and hydroxypropylglycine on Chinese women (n = 85) of at least 35 years of age [22]. The study was comprised of 3 main groups: 1 was randomized to receive collagen peptides (higher content), 1 was randomized to collagen peptides (lower content), and the last group received placebo [22]. The total duration of the study was roughly 2 months, and participants took their respective treatments daily. Both intervention arms demonstrated substantial improvement in skin moisture, especially around the cheek and canthus, as opposed to the placebo group, which displayed no such improvements. Moreover, the findings also showed a substantial increase in the moisture and elasticity of the skin, as well as a reduction in wrinkling and roughness in the first treatment group, unlike either the second or the placebo groups, as shown in Table 1 [22].
Usage of Oral Collagen Supplements: Evidence from Animal Studies
Apart from studies conducted on human beings, animals have been examined as well to assess the effect of collagen [23]. In animal models, the authors have used clinical and histological appearance, along with gene expression, to study the necessary outcomes. One research was carried out to assess the consequences of collagen hydrolysates on 9-month-old mice for 24 weeks. The results of the study revealed a significant increase in both distribution and density of said collagen and ratio between type I and type III collagen, with a particular dose-response relationship [23].
In another study, collagen peptides were given to mice for one and a half months [24]. The authors found a higher expression of genes, along with their upregulation in the skin [24]. One more study was conducted on mice, in which they were fed a diet containing collagen hydrolysate for roughly 3 months. The study revealed improvements in the water content of their skin and an increase in elasticity, as opposed to the mice in the control group, who experienced no such benefits [25]. Lastly, mice were observed on a diet rich in prolylhydroxyproline and hydroxypropylglycine for around 5 weeks in one more study. The mice that received collagen hydrolysates showed increased skin hydration [26].
Usage of Topical Collagen Application on Delaying the Aging Process
Generally, there have been fewer studies assessing the effect of topical collagen on the aging process when compared with the studies conducted for oral collagen supplements. For instance, one conducted by Sanz et al in 2015 revealed that those women who were asked to apply a product containing collagen performed better than those in the control group [27]. More specifically, around three quarters of the treated women showed anti-wrinkling effects and substantial increases in the dermal density and elasticity of their skin after 7 days of treatment [27]. Similarly, Matthias et al conducted a retrospective study in Germany and South Africa on 480 patients with wrinkles, lax skin, scarring, and stretch marks [28]. These patients were administered percutaneous collagen after preparing their skin with necessary vitamins and creams for at least 1 month [28]. The findings demonstrated that patients were found to have skin 60% to 80% improved from before the treatment. Furthermore, researchers carried out a histologic examination on a subset of patients that demonstrated a substantial upsurge in collagen and elastin deposition. There was around 40% thickening of the epidermis, mainly stratum spinosum, 1 year after treatment [28].
Similarly, Campos et al evaluated the consequences of topical and oral collagen additions in the skin enhancement of 60 healthy female subjects. The findings showed that females who were given a topical product demonstrated a substantial rise in skin hydration and elasticity at the end of 1 month. On the other hand, the group with oral supplementation showed more noticeable results in dermal echogenicity and decreasing pore size at the end of 3 months without any adverse effects [29]. Another study demonstrated that those patients who received topical treatment showed a noteworthy depletion in the total wrinkle surface, number of wrinkles, and average wrinkle length and depth were observed in comparison with those who underwent placebo.
In addition, the anti-wrinkle activity of the topical triple peptide complex (3%) has been reported by a clinical research conducted by Byrne et al in 2010. Their findings suggested that topical application significantly improves the photo-damaged skin by the end of 1 month when compared with the placebo group [30]. These studies revealed noteworthy relative depletions in the number of wrinkles and total wrinkle surface -in conjunction with increase in their mean depth and length -at the end of 1 month, ranging from 10% to 28% [30].
Mechanism of Action of Collagen Supplements
One of the proteins found in abundance in human beings is collagen, and it helps to maintain the structure, stability, and strength of the dermal layers [31]. The studies have shown antioxidant and established reparative actions of collagen in wrinkled or damaged skin. Skin experiences the double action of collagen: first, it provides the skin essential components for both elastin and collagen, and second, it is attached to the fibroblast receptors in the dermis to initiate the production of elastin and hyaluronic acid [32]. So far, oral collagen has been studied to a greater extent than topical collagen. The available literature suggests that the topical application of collagen improves both skin elasticity and texture. However, topical collagen does not infiltrate the skin completely owning to its high molecular weight [33]. In contrast, oral collagen ingestion has been found to improve mechanical properties by increasing both the density and the diameter of collagen fibrils [34]. Orally consumed collagen bioactive peptides are absorbed relatively quickly because such collagen products have lower molecular weights, distributing these peptides easily across several tissues [35]. Additionally, evidence from the animal models suggested that oral administration of collagen reduces the intensity of skin hydration caused by UV radiation and also reduces hyperplasia of the epidermis caused by UV rays [36]. Furthermore, oral intake of collagen enhances the moisture content of the skin, especially the stratum corneum, as well as the elasticity of the skin, reducing wrinkling and roughness [37]. Overall, collagen causes an increase in fibroblasts and extracellular matrix proteins and a decrease in metalloproteinase. These rising fibroblasts found in the various layers of the human dermis produce a plethora of extracellular matrix proteins that enhance skin health and thus slow skin aging [38].
Side Effects of Collagen Supplements Reported in Human Studies
Generally, no adverse effects of oral and topical collagen have been observed in any of these studies [39]. There have been no side effects such as vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, or constipation reported in the treatment or control groups of any of the studies [40]. For example, trials conducted in 2019 and 2020 found no adverse effects of collagen until they observed their participants [39,41]. These findings were also confirmed by a research by Inoue et al in 2017, where they conducted a RCT to assess the effect of high versus low doses of collagen and placebo [22]. Likewise, Genovese et al had shown analogous findings concerning the side effects during the period of study while comparing the effect of supplements on skin elasticity, wrinkling, and roughness with the placebo [19]. Besides, these findings were further endorsed by a study conducted in 2013 by Proksch et al: the authors found no side effects in any of the 4 groups that were assigned to high-dose collagen, low-dose collagen, a high-dose placebo, or a low-dose placebo [20]. One more double-blinded RCT conducted on Korean women showed no adverse events related to the treatment or intervention throughout the study period [21]. Similarly, there were no adverse effects of topical collagen in various studies [28–30].
Conclusions
Based on the existing literature from both animal and human studies, it seems that oral collagen supplements improve skin elasticity, turgor, and hydration and reduce skin wrinkling and roughness. The existing premise reveals that neither oral nor topical collagen is superior to the other; rather, both types reduce or delay skin aging. Thus, products of collagen peptides can be considered to be anti-aging remedies by dermatologists, especially in cosmetics. However, the existing evidence has not provided enough robust evidence for collagen supplements due to differences in the weights of collagen being topically and systemically absorbed. Hence, more epidemiological and interventional studies with large sample sizes and required follow-up appointments are requested to assess the effectiveness of the topical compounds containing collagen on wrinkled and aging skin while comparing the same to the oral collagen supplement instead of the placebo. As the trend of both forms of collagen supplement use might continue to rise, more thorough research is required to validate their potential positive effects before they are widely used.
One of the strengths of the included studies was research design, as all the studies on human beings were RCTs that provided solid evidence due to the balance of known and unknown confounders between the treatment and control groups. However, the types and doses of collagen were not similar across the studies; therefore, further studies with consistent doses in different settings may be required before making any judgments about the use of oral collagen. This is crucial because some of the proponents of collagen might try to apply the results of animal models to human beings, but animal studies cannot be generalized to humans due to differences in physiological and biological mechanisms. In the same way, these collagen products have usually been tested in the developed or high-income sectors of different age groups. Thus, there is no evidence about whether these products could produce analogous results in the various populations residing in low- to middle-income countries with limited resources. Hence, this warrants the replication of similar studies in developing countries by using a similar study design. Lastly, the review found no side effects of either topical or oral collagen treatment during the study period, and most of the studies had followed their participants for 12–24 weeks. Thus, there is no clear evidence about how these collagen products function after the study ends and whether these products tend to produce adverse effects in the long run that need to be further explored.
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Funding: None.
References
1. Tobin DJ. Introduction to skin aging. J Tissue Viability. 2017;26(1):37–46. doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2016.03.002. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Barbosa MC, Grosso RA, Fader CM. Hallmarks of aging: an autophagic perspective. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019;9:790. doi:10.3389/fendo.2018.00790. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Cannarozzo G, Fazia G, Bennardo L, et al. A New 675 nm Laser Device in the Treatment of Facial Aging: A Prospective Observational Study. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021;39(2):118–122. doi:10.1089/photob.2020.4908. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Nistico SP, Silvestri M, Zingoni T, Tamburi F, Bennardo L, Cannarozzo G. Combination of Fractional CO2 Laser and Rhodamine-Intense Pulsed Light in Facial Rejuvenation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021;39(2):113–117. doi:10.1089/photob.2020.4876. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Varani J, Dame MK, Rittie L, et al. Decreased collagen production in chronologically aged skin: Roles of age-dependent alteration in fibroblast function and defective mechanical stimulation. Am J Pathol. 2006;168(6):1861–1868. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2006.051302. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Lee DH, Oh J-H, Chung JH. Glycosaminoglycan and proteoglycan in skin aging. Journal of Dermatological Science. 2016;83(3):174–181. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2016.05.016. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Reilly DM, Lozano J. Skin collagen through the lifestages: importance for skin health and beauty. Plast Aesthet Res. 2021;8:2. doi:10.20517/2347-9264.2020.153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. De Melo F, Nicolau P, Piovano L, et al. Recommendations for volume augmentation and rejuvenation of the face and hands with the new generation polycaprolactone-based collagen stimulator (Ellansé®) Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2017;10:431–440. doi:10.2147/CCID.S145195. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Li P, Wu G. Roles of dietary glycine, proline, and hydroxyproline in collagen synthesis and animal growth. Amino Acids. 2018;50(1):29–38. doi:10.1007/s00726-017-2490-6. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Felician FF, Xia C, Qi W, Xu H. Collagen from marine biological sources and medical applications. Chem Biodivers. 2018;15(5):e1700557. doi:10.1002/cbdv.201700557. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Cho BA, Yoo S-K, Seo J-S. Signatures of photo-aging and intrinsic aging in skin were revealed by transcriptome network analysis. Aging (Albany NY) 2018;10(7):1609–1626. doi:10.18632/aging.101496. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. McCabe MC, Hill RC, Calderone K, et al. Alterations in extracellular matrix composition during aging and photoaging of the skin. Matrix Biol Plus. 2020;8:100041. doi:10.1016/j.mbplus.2020.100041. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Zhang L, Zhang S, Song H, Li B. Ingestion of collagen hydrolysates alleviates skin chronological aging in an aged mouse model by increasing collagen synthesis. Food Funct. 2020;11(6):5573–5580. doi:10.1039/d0fo00153h. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Exposito JY, Valcourt U, Cluzel C, Lethias C. The fibrillar collagen family. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11(2):407–426. doi:10.3390/ijms11020407. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Zhang Z, Wang J, Ding Y, Dai X, Li Y. Oral administration of marine collagen peptides from Chum Salmon skin enhances cutaneous wound healing and angiogenesis in rats. J Sci Food Agric. 2011;91(12):2173–2179. doi:10.1002/jsfa.4435. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Sionkowska A, Skrzyński S, Śmiechowski K, Kołodziejczak A. The review of versatile application of collagen. Polymers for Advanced Technologies. 2017;28(1):4–9. doi:10.1002/pat.3842. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Choi SY, Ko EJ, Lee YH, et al. Effects of collagen tripeptide supplement on skin properties: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2014;16(3):132–137. doi:10.3109/14764172.2013.854119. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Addor FASA, Vieira JC, Melo CSA. Improvement of dermal parameters in aged skin after oral use of a nutrient supplement. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2018;11:195–201. doi:10.2147/CCID.S150269. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
19. Genovese L, Corbo A, Sibilla S. An insight into the changes in skin texture and properties following dietary intervention with a nutricosmeceutical containing a blend of collagen bioactive peptides and antioxidants. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2017;30(3):146–158. doi:10.1159/000464470. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Proksch E, Segger D, Degwert J, Schunck M, Zague V, Oesser S. Oral supplementation of specific collagen peptides has beneficial effects on human skin physiology: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2014;27(1):47–55. doi:10.1159/000351376. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Kim D-U, Chung H-C, Choi J, Sakai Y, Lee B-Y. Oral intake of low-molecular-weight collagen peptide improves hydration, elasticity, and wrinkling in human skin: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nutrients. 2018;10(7):826. doi:10.3390/nu10070826. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Inoue N, Sugihara F, Wang X. Ingestion of bioactive collagen hydrolysates enhance facial skin moisture and elasticity and reduce facial ageing signs in a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study. J Sci Food Agric. 2016;96(12):4077–4081. doi:10.1002/jsfa.7606. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Wang Z, Wang Q, Wang L, et al. Improvement of skin condition by oral administration of collagen hydrolysates in chronologically aged mice. J Sci Food Agric. 2017;97(9):2721–2726. doi:10.1002/jsfa.8098. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Le Vu P, Takatori R, Iwamoto T, et al. Effects of food-derived collagen peptides on the expression of keratin and keratin-associated protein genes in the Mouse Skin. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2015;28(5):227–235. doi:10.1159/000369830. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Oba C, Ito K, Ichikawa S, et al. Effect of orally administered collagen hydrolysate on gene expression profiles in mouse skin: A DNA microarray analysis. Physiol Genomics. 2015;47(8):355–363. doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00009.2015. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Shimizu J, Asami N, Kataoka A, et al. Oral collagen-derived dipeptides, prolyl-hydroxyproline and hydroxyprolyl-glycine, ameliorate skin barrier dysfunction and alter gene expression profiles in the skin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;456(2):626–630. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.12.006. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Sanz MT, Campos C, Milani M, et al. Biorevitalizing effect of a novel facial serum containing apple stem cell extract, pro-collagen lipopeptide, creatine, and urea on skin aging signs. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15(1):24–30. doi:10.1111/jocd.12173. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Aust MC, Fernandes D, Kolokythas P, Kaplan HM, Vogt PM. Percutaneous collagen induction therapy: an alternative treatment for scars, wrinkles, and skin laxity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(4):1421–1429. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000304612.72899.02. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Maia Campos PMBG, Melo MO, Siqueira César FC. Topical application and oral supplementation of peptides in the improvement of skin viscoelasticity and density. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18(6):1693–1699. doi:10.1111/jocd.12893. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Byrne AJ, Al-Bader T, Kerrigan D, Hickey S, Laloeuf A, Rawlings AV. Synergistic action of a triple peptide complex on an essential extra-cellular matrix protein exhibits significant anti-aging benefits. Cosmet Dermatol. 2010;9(2):108–116. doi:10.1111/j.1473-2165.2010.00494.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Ricard-Blum S. The collagen family. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3(1):a004978. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a004978. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Lephart ED. Equol’s anti-aging effects protect against environmental assaults by increasing skin antioxidant defense and ECM proteins while decreasing oxidative stress and inflammation. Cosmetics. 2018;5(1):16. doi:10.3390/cosmetics5010016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Bos JD, Meinardi MM. The 500 Dalton rule for the skin penetration of chemical compounds and drugs. Exp Dermatol. 2000;9(3):165–169. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0625.2000.009003165.x. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. Matsuda N, Koyama Y, Hosaka Y, et al. Effects of ingestion of collagen peptide on collagen fibrils and glycosaminoglycans in the dermis. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 2006;52(3):211–215. doi:10.3177/jnsv.52.211. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
35. Watanabe-Kamiyama M, Shimizu M, Kamiyama S, et al. Absorption and effectiveness of orally administered low molecular weight collagen hydrolysate in rats. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(2):835–841. doi:10.1021/jf9031487. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Tanaka M, Koyama Y, Nomura Y. Effects of collagen peptide ingestion on UV-B-induced skin damage. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2009;73(4):930–932. doi:10.1271/bbb.80649. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
37. Matsumoto H. Clinical effects of fish type I collagen hydrolysate on skin properties. ITE Lett Batter New Technol Med. 2006;7:386–390. [Google Scholar]
38. Avila Rodríguez MI, Rodriguez Barroso LG, Sánchez ML. Collagen: A review on its sources and potential cosmetic applications. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17(1):20–26. doi:10.1111/jocd.12450. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
39. Žmitek K, Žmitek J, Rogl Butina M, Pogačnik T. Effects of a combination of water-soluble coenzyme Q10 and collagen on skin parameters and condition: Results of a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Nutrients. 2020;12(3):618. doi:10.3390/nu12030618. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
40. Sangsuwan W, Asawanonda P. Four-weeks daily intake of oral collagen hydrolysate results in improved skin elasticity, especially in sun-exposed areas: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021;32(8):991–996. doi:10.1080/09546634.2020.1725412. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Bolke L, Schlippe G, Gerß J, Voss W. A collagen supplement improves skin hydration, elasticity, roughness, and density: Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, blind study. Nutrients. 2019;11(10):2494. doi:10.3390/nu11102494. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
42. Asserin J, Lati E, Shioya T, Prawitt J. The effect of oral collagen peptide supplementation on skin moisture and the dermal collagen network: evidence from an ex vivo model and randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015;14(4):291–301. doi:10.1111/jocd.12174. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Dermatology Practical & Conceptual are provided here courtesy of Mattioli 1885
